Invermere adopts Rockefeller ‘climate’ agenda
February 4, 2010 by Lynn Knell
Filed under Environment, Freedom, Global issues, Invermere, Local government, Local news
Close to fifty Invermere residents met with the District of Invermere Council at Pynelogs Cultural Centre on Tuesday evening, February 2, 2010, for the unveiling of the DOI’s Climate Adaptation Report and the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Reduction Strategy.
Wildsight’s Megan Walsh, who along with Amanda Fredrigo had prepared the Climate Adaptation Report, presented the audience with well-researched and documented findings, based on the latest climate change statistics and models available.
Mayor Taft then introduced the District’s Strategy, which is designed to assist the District of Invermere in implementing and achieving their commitments to climate action. The strategy was made possible by the generous support of the LaSalle Adams Fund, a Rockefeller initiative.
Mayor Taft spoke of some of the initiatives that have already been implemented, such as the no-idling and the lawn watering restriction bylaws, or those in the process of being implemented, and then of the ideas that may be considered in the future, as funds become available. Curbside composting, as an example, would be costly but could perhaps be introduced down the road.
The reader can access both the Climate Adaptation Report and the Greenhouse Gas Emmission Reduction Strategy here:
(PDF – 5.25MB)
(PDF – 9.04MB)
Is this for real? Is council really accepting money from a Rockefeller fund in exchange for toeing the climate-change line? I guess it just goes to show how easily governments can be bought these days!
Excuse me, but I don’t remember anyone ever consulting the people over something as far-reaching as this. This is one case where it is pretty obvious that they are not following the will of the people as a whole, just listening to the noisiest voices at their doors (the Wildsight green lobbyists). Was it not clear from the Copenhagen Conference on climate change that people do not support this? How could they when there is not even agreement yet on whether man-made global warming even exists? The conference failed to produce a single tiny agreement among the States Parties. It was such a dismal propaganda failure.
Why is DOI still flogging this dead climate change horse? Why don’t they just get on with the important environmental initiatives that are patently good and skip all the nuclear-lobby propaganda? We don’t need a back-door global government that rules by tyranny and techno-economic slavery. I think council is really showing its colors on this one and should be embarrassed by how it has swallowed the propaganda, hook lie and sinker (that is not a typo).
I attended the meeting at Pynelogs and I have to say that I came away very sad and discouraged. The words “climate change” have produced just about as much fear in the poplulation as the fear of war, maybe even more, and I see people are behaving like little puppets, doing what they are told, running around, trying to put their fingers in the holes in the dam. It is even being legislated now, that if we don’t put more and more fingers in the dam, it will be our fault when the big catastrophe comes. And by the way, it is all our fault anyway! And meanwhile, the real polluters, the mega corporations, are just laughing at us and will continue with business as usual, wreaking havoc all over the planet.
In that fear-driven frenzy, nobody seems to be listening to the scientific voices that are telling us that the whole climate change concept was an invention of a few who have a very dark agenda. People have bought the whole package, lies and all, and have forgotten how to think for themselves. Don’t we remember the scandal of Climategate, when the lies were revealed to the whole world?
Here is a perfect example: At Pynelogs the other night, there were door prizes and the second prize was a package of those deadly compact fluorescent light bulbs that we obedient little puppets are buying by the gazillions and governments are enforcing the use of, all to reduce our “carbon footprint”. Doesn’t anybody read the truth that these lightbulbs take more of the planet’s energy to make than they will ever save in their lifetimes? They also contain a small, but nevertheless lethal amount of mercury and that mercury is going to find its way into our landfills, turning them into hazardous waste dumps. Mercury will never decompose and so will be there forever. Also, those lightbulbs have been shown to be dangerous to your health. As are any fluorescent lights.
So why, I am asking, is the District of Invermere buying into this fear-mongering without doing their own homework? The really sad part is that we look to our governments at all levels to lead us in the right direction, not down the rabbit hole.
I want to thank the District of Invermere for at least trying to do something to make the environment better for us who live here. I know it is very difficult to mandate change for the permanent residents when at least half the population come here to relax and not have to think about the environment.
I don’t know how we can balance this peculiar and unique situation but I do know that the DOI is trying to find solutions and they deserve a huge pat on the back.
If any wants to read a very chilling damnation of the CO 2 will destroy the world cult, you might want to pick up the book ” Heaven and Earth ” by Ian Plimer. An Australian professor and author of numerous reports.
He very bluntly shows the deciet and lies perpetrated on societies throughout the world by Mann and company and the IPCC incompetence in vetting information.
It truely is fritghtening how so many people have been dupped by the fear mongering groups that have cried wolf so many times in so many manners.
Apparently, and this is shown time and again in this very fact inclusion book, that the world is warming – - – - some of the time – - – in some areas
It shows / proves without question that CO 2 has absolutley nothing , read Nothiing to do with climate warming or change or cooling. CO2 consists of all of 3% of the make up of the atmosphere. Water vapour, the effects of our own sun have about 3000 % more influence on climate than does a few cars, factories or even volcanoes.
Sorry folks, but after reading a very informative book, it obvious that so many people have been duped by a small group and organizations, and that governements throughout the world have been lied to by the few.
What is truely unfortuanate, is that these liers have helped destroy those that need credibility to have any influence. Unfortuanately, in our area, that has been groups like Wildsite and JJCXYZ against everything to do with the outdoors.
They defiinitely need to understand how much they have been manipulated. We need to understand how we have been manipulated. By Mann, by the IPCC and by Gore.
We have definitely been gorred
Here are a few quotes from people in positions of power in our world:
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” – Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony… climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
- Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment
“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” – Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
- Dr David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University
“Climate change is real. Not only is it real, it’s here, and its effects are giving rise to a frighteningly new global phenomenon: the man-made natural disaster.”
- Barack Obama, US President
And here’s one more, from a Canadian, no less, although not a very nice one:
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse?
Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” – Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
And there’s more, much much more, folks. Yes we have indeed been duped and by those we trusted!
Here’s a good site with more info: http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
Wildsight do some good work for the lake, teaching kids about nature, and stuff like that. But I think they should have looked twice before jumping into this climate change stuff. If they had done their homework and thought for themselves they would not be in this bind now – where they feel they have to promote “climate action” but also have to adopt un-environmentally friendly ways to supposedly do it – such as those infamouse curly tubes of death – CFL light bulbs. No one in their right mind can think that CFL bulbs are healthy and environmentally better. I would love to know who invented the plan to push these and how they figured people would actually fall for it.
Wildsight should stick to the truth and stick to what is good for the environment. In my mind they are starting to lose credibility.
Why did the District of Invermere take funding from the Rockefeller cabal in order to do this study? Don’t they understand that anything that the Rockefellers give money to has a very dark agenda behind it and must be supremely suspect?
David Rockefeller has been quoted as saying, “”We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis…”. He is a founding member and on the executive of the notorious Club of Rome, the premier environmental think tank and consultant to the United Nations, who have this to say:
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
This is the biggest scam in the history of the planet, manufactured behind closed doors, and its ultimate agenda is One World Government, the reduction of 95% of the world’s population through planned wars, planned poverty, planned starvation, planned disease,sterilization by vaccinations and other means.
Paul Watson, the co-founder of Greenpeace has said “It doesn’t matter what is true,it only matters what people believe is true.”
We look to our governments to lead us in the right direction, not abuse our intelligence.
If the reader wants to know exactly what the climate change scandal is really covering up, I strongly suggest linking to this video. Then maybe we won’t be apologizing for taking up space on this planet.
http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/members/lmoret.htm
So many old chestnuts hitting the ground here that grew from the climate denial industry tree.
“no agreement”
“toeing the climate-change line”
“Water vapour, the effects of our own sun”
“fear-mongering”
“climate change scandal”
May they go way of these you may remember:
“smoking isn’t necessarily bad for you;”
“it’s not certain that asbestos will give you cancer;”
“your seatbelt might actually kill you if you’re the one person in five trillion whose buckle jams just as your car flips into a watery ditch.”
—–
No amount of tobacco-industry-style doubt campaigns,
no amount of oil-industry junk science,
and definitely not two erroneous citations in a 3,000 page peer-reviewed scientific document
will obscure what is obvious:
Climate change is real.
It is happening now.
It is happening faster than we thought.
Let’s prepare to adapt to it.
Oh, and check out:
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/exxon-secrets
To Gorred (sic) in Columbias:
That book you love so dearly, Heaven and Earth, by Ian Plimer?
Junk science, as it turns out.
The water vapour argument evaporates:
“Perhaps the weakest part of the book is the discussion around CO2 absorption in the infra-red, which of course is critical to the whole issue. Having cited endless papers on everything else, he finally gets to this key point and cites almost nothing at all.
He claims that the greenhouse gases that already exist in the atmosphere absorb most of the infra-red which means there is nothing more to absorb so there need be no fear of rising levels of greenhouse gases. I have spoken to colleagues who study the science very carefully and external climate scientists and this issue has long been put to rest. The reality is the opposite, i.e. that rising levels of trace gases are contributing to increased infra-red absorption. More importantly, the trace gases are driving (forcing mechanism) the change as they accumulate in the atmosphere, whereas water vapour, which Plimer talks about as the only greenhouse gas that really matters, is responding as a feedback mechanism with rising temperature.
Water can only ever act in this way as it cannot accumulate in the atmosphere. If there is too much it rains. It is even possible to see all this from satellite data, which shows the difference in absorption spectra as seen from above our atmosphere over the period 1970 to 1997 (although presumably Plimer wouldn’t like this study as quite a bit of data processing has been done – seems to be a pet hate of his).”
This is from an enlightening review of the book you believe in by David Hone, Climate Change Advisor for Royal Dutch Shell.
Hone also describes Plimer’s arguments as,
“Disingenuous,” using “faulty logic” and “plain wrong.”
For example:
“IPCC have no computer climate models, although Plimer constantly refers to the “IPCC models” and their “doubtful findings”. Rather the models exist in the various research institutions that IPCC draws on. ”
http://theenergycollective.com/TheEnergyCollective/49608
I think its very ovbious that climate change is real and we are causing it. Even if this were not true the bottom line is that pollution is BAD no matter how we look at it or what we call it. We should do what we can to minimalize it as much as possible. Im 27 and I am concerned as to what this world is going to look like in another 27 years. We all should be.
You know what? I used to consider myself an environmentalist. I used to be meticulous about keeping my footprint small. But last December’s shameful Copenhagen conference changed all that. I will no longer have anything to do with environmentalism, even though I support the original basic principles. That is because the environmental movement has been hijacked. It is a huge setback for real, honest environmentalists everywhere.
Now, as soon as I read the words “climate change” or “global warming” or anyhting like that, I shut down and switch mental channels. It has become too hard to separate the truth from the lies. It has become too political.
Too bad.
Yes, Ryan, climate change is real but so little of it is caused by humans, unless of course you are speaking about the powerful people with very dark agendas who are deliberately filling the atmosphere with unimaginable toxins via chemtrails and electro-magnetic waves from cell phone towers and HAARP in an effort to destroy our immune systems. Now don’t go accusing me of being a fear-monger and a conspiracy theorist — this is real and it won’t pay in the long run for you or any of us to go into denial about it. Only if we are aware of this fact of our present-day reality, can we do anything to protect ourselves. By anything, I mean that each of us has to decide what we can do. Building up our immune systems is a good way to begin. Not listening to the mainstream media’s lies and misinformation is another. And doing a whole lot of research on your own is absolutely essential.
Shanna, I have found myself doing exactly the same thing as you are saying – withdrawing mentally whenever I hear or read anything about climate change. Maybe that is exactly what those who deliberately misled the whole world about “global warming” wanted to do. To make those who knew the truth of the scam just “turn off”. That would effectively shut us up, wouldn’t it?
To those who would accuse me of being in denial, I am fully aware of the serious, very nearly irreversible damage that has been done to this planet that is our home. I really think that focusing on this fact could have saved the Copenhagen Conference in the end. Of course, there was another agenda here, so maybe not. But we can do our part, each of us, to soften our footsteps on the earth. That I do agree is essential.